UKCI2003 Paper Review Form

General Review Information
Version	1
Reviewer	Tim Kovacs
Paper Number	1
Title	Evolving Solutions to Problems
Contact Person	John Doe

1 - Recommendation
	A: Accept for oral presentation.
	B: Accept for poster presentation.
	C: Borderline (the paper has pros and cons).
	D: Reject.

2 - What is your overall expertise concerning the subject areas of this paper?
	X: I am an expert.
	Y: I am knowledgeable in the area, though not an expert
	Z: I am not an expert. My evaluation is that of an informed outsider.

3 - RELEVANCE of this paper to Computational Intelligence?
	A: Excellent.
	B: Good.
	C: Fair.
	D: Weak.
	E: Poor.

4 - SIGNIFICANCE and USEFULNESS
	A: Excellent.
	B: Good.
	C: Fair.
	D: Weak.
	E: Poor.

5 - technical SOUNDNESS
	A: Excellent.
	B: Good.
	C: Fair.
	D: Weak.
	E: Poor.

6 - PRESENTATION - overall organisation of paper
	A: Excellent.
	B: Good.
	C: Fair.
	D: Weak.
	E: Poor.

7 - READABILITY - clarity of writing, quality of English
	A: Excellent.
	B: Good.
	C: Fair.
	D: Weak.
	E: Poor.

8 - Further comments, advice or explanations (Please be specific and constructive, especially with respect to any negative judgements above).

9 - Comments for the Program Committee only (Not shown to the authors)

Click the button left below to store your review

CyberChair 4 Author: Richard van de Stadt (Borbala Online Conference Services) Development supported by TRESE Copyright © by University of Twente